Hiya! Remember me? No? Oh, fine. Neither do I, so I guess we’re even.
While it may not look like I’ve been reading much at all by the total lack of posting, you’ll be surprised to know that my lack of posting is due to two things that aren’t that:
1. The “L” key was stuck on my keyboard.
2. I’ve been too busy reading!
I know — not exactly as solid as Jessica’s “I spent the last year creating and raising a human being” excuse, but it’s a start.
As for the reading, what has been going down is that, inspired by David Denby’s classic Great Books project, I decided to, well, not to read all the great books necessarily, but to spend this year reading the books I personally should have read by now. Books most other people read in high school that I managed to avoid by taking extra Latin classes (Catcher In the Rye, To Kill a Mockingbird). Books I know I love from reading passages and visiting museum exhibits that I still haven’t read all the way through (Lolita, Catch-22). Books all my friends have said I should read and, in fact, are shocked — SHOCKED — that I haven’t yet (The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, Fortress of Solitude).
To keep my sanity I have a couple rules for this effort.
1. No Reading Books I Don’t Like — Each book gets 20 pages of my undivided attention before I bail. If I don’t want to turn the page then I stop no matter how highly recommended. A couple titans have fallen to this one already. (I’m looking at you, Adventures of Augie March!)
2. No Need to Read Fast — Time-limit reading challenges bore me. So do massive-amounts-of-reading challenges. You read 200 classics in 10 months? Yawn.
3. It’s OK to Take Breaks — As much as there are books I have to read there are also those I don’t but still will. This weekend I read three issues of the New Yorker and five issues of Howard the Duck, so there.
I’m already several books in so I’m going to try and go back and fill in some of the lost posts here and try in vain to capture some of that spirit of discovery. But the whole entire point of this post isn’t about me (surprise!). It’s about you! Why don’t you read some Books YOU Should Have Read Before? And please tell us about it, won’t you?
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 26, 2010 at 2:29 pm
Jessica
I LOVE LOVE LOVE this!! I really do. I’m going to join you but with the caveat that I might reread some that I read as a kid and didn’t like. If you say Catcher in the Rye isn’t the monster I think it is, I believe you. But I’m gonna have to see for myself.
I’m not sure what your list is but if they are not on there, A Tree Grows in Brooklyn and Uncle Tom’s Cabin should make the cut (unless of course you’ve already read them). I will be posting on UTC this week hopefully since I’ve been reading it for a LOOOOOONG time (a new one for me!).
October 28, 2010 at 9:29 pm
matt
A god book to read is the hunger games by Suzanne collins.
November 8, 2010 at 11:59 pm
Nathalie Foy
Oh! I love that David Denby inspired you! His book is so wonderful, and, like you, he said he’d not write about the books he read for the Columbia course that he did not like (too many books, too small a word allowance). In _The Rights of the Reader_ Daniel Pennac makes the following observation: “Time to read is always stolen … from the tyranny of living. … The question isn’t whether I have time to read or not (time that nobody will ever give me, by the way), but whether I’ll allow myself the pleasure of being a reader.” Pleasure means not slogging through something that does not speak to you, slow reading, and soaking up book love through every pore.